The Experience Gap: Why Omnichannel Presence Isn't the Same as Omnichannel Performance
Most brands and retailers have solved for omnichannel presence. They have a website, an app, a loyalty program, and a store. They're on social. They offer BOPIS. By every infrastructure checklist, they're omnichannel. So why are shoppers still switching, abandoning, and expressing frustration at the exact moments brands expect loyalty?
Because presence and performance are not the same thing. And in 2026, shoppers can tell the difference.
The real omnichannel challenge has quietly shifted. It's no longer about building the channels. It's about whether those channels work together in a way that actually holds the shopper's journey together. And right now, for most brands and retailers, there's an experience gap between the infrastructure that exists and the coherence that shoppers expect.
Shoppers Don't Think in Channels, They Think in Journeys
Here's the fundamental truth driving the experience gap: shoppers don't experience channels. They experience moments. They discover a product on TikTok, compare prices on a desktop browser, check availability in-store on their phone, and pick it up curbside. That's not a multi-channel journey to them — it's just shopping.
The data backs this up. According to Salsify's 2026 Consumer Research, 67% of shoppers engage in webrooming (researching online, buying in-store) and 53% engage in showrooming (researching in-store, buying online). That means the majority of purchase journeys actively cross at least two channels — and every crossing is an opportunity for either trust or friction.
When the experience holds together across those crossings — when the product information matches, the price is consistent, the loyalty offer follows them — the shopper barely notices. When it breaks down, they notice immediately. And in a low-confidence economy where shoppers are more deliberate and less tolerant of friction, one breakdown is often enough to lose them.
What the Experience Gap Actually Looks Like
The experience gap rarely looks like a catastrophic failure. It looks like small inconsistencies that erode trust at exactly the wrong moment:
-
A loyalty offer visible on the app that doesn't appear at the register
-
A BOPIS order that's ready — but the pickup experience is confusing and slow
-
A product marked "available" online that's out of stock in-store
-
An online substitution in a grocery order that permanently shifts the shopper's mental model of the brand
None of these are channel failures. They're coherence failures. And coherence failures compound: each small breakdown increases perceived risk, which in a trust-depleted environment, gets amplified.
The SAP Emarsys 2026 Omnichannel Retail data points to another dimension: nearly 70% of shoppers check their phones in-store to compare prices or look up reviews. This isn't showrooming — it's a real-time trust audit happening at the shelf. If the in-store and digital experiences tell different stories, the shopper will notice, and they'll factor it in.
Coverage vs. Coherence: The New Measurement Problem
The reason the experience gap persists is partly a measurement problem. Most brands and retailers measure omnichannel coverage: How many channels are we on? What's our BOPIS adoption rate? What's our app download count?
These are useful metrics, but they don't tell you whether the experience is actually working. They measure presence, not performance.
Measuring omnichannel coherence requires looking at behavior at the seams — the moments where shoppers move between channels. That's where the experience gap reveals itself, and where the real competitive advantage is built or lost.

If your omnichannel metrics only measure what each channel does in isolation, you're measuring coverage — not coherence. The experience gap lives in the space between your channels, not inside them.
A Retailer's Lens: The Experience Gap Lives in Your Own Channels Too
For retailers, the experience gap isn't just about how channels relate to each other — it's also about whether your own digital infrastructure is performing consistently across surfaces. The web experience, the app experience, and the in-store digital experience are often built and managed by different teams. Shoppers don't care. They expect them to behave as one.
The most common retailer-specific coherence failures aren't dramatic. They're quiet: a loyalty offer that renders correctly on the app but doesn't surface in the web checkout flow. A product that shows as in-stock online but triggers a substitution at fulfillment. A personalized promotion served through email that doesn't appear when the shopper opens the app five minutes later. Each one is small. Together, they teach shoppers that your digital experience can't be relied on.
There's also a performance dimension that's distinctly a retailer problem. App and web experiences don't just need to tell the same story — they need to perform comparably. Bounce rate gaps between mobile web and app, differences in search result quality, or checkout friction that exists on one surface but not another are all experience gaps that show up in conversion data before they show up in shopper feedback.

The retailer experience gap isn't only between channels — it's often between your own digital surfaces. Web, app, and in-store digital tools should convert, personalize, and fulfill at parity. Where they don't, that's where shoppers quietly decide to shop elsewhere.
Closing the Gap: What to Do Now
Closing the experience gap isn't about adding more channels. It's about making the ones you have work together. A few practical starting points:
-
Audit your channel seams. Map where shoppers are most likely to cross channels and identify where the experience breaks down.
-
Measure repeat, not just conversion. Post-event repeat rates (after BOPIS, after a substitution, after a promo redemption) reveal whether the experience delivered on its promise.
-
Treat consistency as a brand KPI. Price, product information, availability, and loyalty offers should tell the same story across every touchpoint.